When one thinks about the Nuremberg trials, one thinks about a small coalition of nations that managed to work together to decide what kind of behavior was unacceptable to humanity, and bring to trial and prosecute Germans involved in such crimes during World War 2. As noted in history.com,
Although the legal justifications for the trials and their procedural innovations were controversial at the time, the Nuremberg trials are now regarded as a milestone toward the establishment of a permanent international court, and an important precedent for dealing with later instances of genocide and other crimes against humanity.
Some people questioned the legitimacy of a coalition made up the allied nations who ‘won’ the war acting on behalf of all of humanity against their enemy.
Harlan Stone (1872-1946), chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court at the time, described the proceedings as a “sanctimonious fraud” and a “high-grade lynching party.” William O. Douglas (1898-1980), then an associate U.S. Supreme Court justice, said the Allies “substituted power for principle” at Nuremberg.
The Berlin Commission of Inquiry
What is being called Nuremberg 2.0 are legal proceedings that sprung from a Commission of Inquiry which began in August 2020. Lead organizer Reiner Fuellmich describes what the commission was tasked with:
‘The hearings of around 100 internationally renowned scientists, doctors, economists and lawyers, which have been conducted by the Berlin Commission of Inquiry into the Covid-19 affair since 10.07.2020, have in the meantime shown with a probability close to certainty that the Covid- 19 scandal was at no time a health issue.
Rather, it was about solidifying the illegitimate power (illegitimate because it was obtained by criminal methods) of the corrupt “Davos clique” by transferring the wealth of the people to the members of the Davos clique, destroying, among other things, small and medium-sized enterprises in particular. Platforms such as Amazon, Google, Uber, etc. could thus appropriate their market share and wealth.
The three major questions to be answered in the context of a judicial approach to the Corona Scandal are:
1) Is there a corona pandemic or is there only a PCR-test pandemic? Specifically, does a positive PCR-test result mean that the person tested is infected with Covid-19, or does it mean absolutely nothing in connection with the Covid-19 infection?
2) Do the so-called anti-corona measures, such as the lockdown, mandatory face masks, social distancing, and quarantine regulations, serve to protect the world’s population from corona? Or do these measures serve only to make people panic so that they believe, without asking any questions, that their lives are in danger — so that, in the end, the pharmaceutical and tech industries can generate huge profits from the sale of PCR tests, antigen and antibody tests and vaccines, as well as the harvesting of our genetic fingerprints?
3) Is it true that the German government was massively lobbied, more so than any other country, by the chief protagonists of this so-called corona pandemic (Mr. Drosten, virologist at Charité Hospital in Berlin; Mr. Wieler, veterinarian and head of the German equivalent of the CDC, the RKI; and Mr. Tedros, head of the World Health Organization or WHO) because Germany is known as a particularly disciplined country and was therefore to become a role model for the rest of the world for its strict and, of course, successful adherence to the corona measures?
Answers to these three questions are urgently needed because the allegedly new and highly dangerous coronavirus has not caused any excess mortality anywhere in the world, and certainly not here in Germany.
But the anti-corona measures, whose only basis are the PCR-test results, which are in turn all based on the German Drosten test, have, in the meantime, caused the loss of innumerable human lives and have destroyed the economic existence of countless companies and individuals worldwide.‘
And the answers that were ascertained were laid out in this Daily Exposure article:
These were the conclusions of the committee –
‘The corona crisis must be renamed the “Corona Scandal”
It is:
• The biggest tort case ever
• The greatest crime against humanity ever committedThose responsible must be:
• Criminally prosecuted for crimes against humanity
• Sued for civil damagesDeaths:
• There is no excess mortality in any country
• Corona virus mortality equals seasonal flu
• 94% of deaths in Bergamo were caused by transferring sick patients to nursing homes where they infected old people with weak immune systems
• Doctors and hospitals worldwide were paid to declare deceased victims of Covid-19
• US states with and without lockdowns have comparable disease and mortality statisticsAutopsies showed:
• Fatalities almost all caused by serious pre-existing conditions
• Almost all deaths were very old people
• Sweden (no lockdown) and Britain (strict lockdown) have comparable disease and mortality statisticsHealth:
• Hospitals remain empty and some face bankruptcy
• Populations have T-cell immunity from previous influenza waves
• Herd immunity needs only 15-25% population infection and is already achieved
• Only when a person has symptoms can an infection be contagiousTests:
• Many scientists call this a PCR-test pandemic, not a corona pandemic
• Very healthy and non-infectious people may test positive
• Likelihood of false-positives is 89-94% or near certainty
• Prof. Drosten developed his PCR test from an old SARS virus without ever having seen the real Wuhan virus from China
• The PCR test is not based on scientific facts with respect to infections
• PCR tests are useless for the detection of infections
• A positive PCR test does not mean an infection is present or that an intact virus has been found
• Amplification of samples over 35 cycles is unreliable but WHO recommended 45 cyclesIllegality:
• The German government locked down, imposed social-distancing/ mask-wearing on the basis of a single opinion
• The lockdown was imposed when the virus was already retreating
• The lockdowns were based on non-existent infections
• Former president of the German federal constitutional court doubted the constitutionality of the corona measures
• Former UK supreme court judge Lord Sumption concluded there was no factual basis for panic and no legal basis for corona measures
• German RKI (CDC equivalent) recommended no autopsies be performed
• Corona measures have no sufficient factual or legal basis, are unconstitutional and must be repealed immediately
• No serious scientist gives any validity to the infamous Neil Ferguson’s false computer models warning of millions of deaths
• Mainstream media completely failed to report the true facts of the so-called pandemic
• Democracy is in danger of being replaced by fascist totalitarian models
• Drosten (of PCR test), Tedros of WHO, and others have committed crimes against humanity as defined in the International Criminal Code
• Politicians can avoid going down with the charlatans and criminals by starting the long overdue public scientific discussionConspiracy:
• Politicians and mainstream media deliberately drove populations to panic
• Children were calculatedly made to feel responsible “for the painful tortured death of their parents and grandparents if they do not follow Corona rules”
• The hopeless PCR test is used to create fear and not to diagnose
• There can be no talk of a second waveInjury and damage:
• Evidence of gigantic health and economic damage to populations
Anti-corona measures have:
• Killed innumerable people
• Destroyed countless companies and individuals worldwide
• Children are being taken away from their parents
• Children are traumatized en masse
• Bankruptcies are expected in small- and medium-sized businessesRedress:
• A class action lawsuit must be filed in the USA or Canada, with all affected parties worldwide having the opportunity to join
• Companies and self-employed people must be compensated for damages’
Why Nuremberg 2.0?
This legal action is something very different from the original Nuremberg trials, in that it is not being initiated by a coalition of nations against an offending nation. In fact, it is not something that is being driven by military-backed ruling powers at all. What Reiner Fuellmich is trying to move forward with is a coalition of ‘ordinary’ human beings, albeit respected experts in many pertinent fields.
In this way the tag ‘Nuremberg 2.0’ seems appropriate, as it is a ‘new and improved’ version, taking direction from ordinary human beings who have been negatively impacted by the ruling class, rather than from the ruling class themselves. And this is why it is extraordinary, and at the same time had to be this way: because the people with all the power are essentially the ones guilty of the crimes.
While the pandemic has served to awaken a critical mass of people to the injustices and overall agenda of the ruling class, the pandemic was not the actual catalyst that got Fuellmich and his group started. In a recent interview, Fuellmich said that they have been working toward this for more than 10 years, and now has between 200 and 300 lawyers on the case, working hard to bring this fruition.
But because Fuellmich does not have the powerful ruling class on his side, as is usually needed to get big things done in the world, there is a lot of skepticism around whether this group will be successful, trying to use International Law based on the Nuremberg codes as a basis for a legal assault on the ruling powers. Fuellmich’s own optimism is founded in his belief that the courts, despite the pervasive influence of the ruling class, still remain capable of upholding truth and justice. As he said in the interview last week,
“In two to three weeks, big things are going to happen on three different continents. Then we will see if the legal system still exists or if it has already been completely taken over by the other side, which I don’t think is the case.”–Reiner Fuellmich
Because mainstream media has either ignored or in some cases tried to marginalize and refute Fuellmich’s claims, the majority of the population has no idea about this. However, the more people are negatively impacted by senseless and inconsistent Pandemic measures, the more they will gravitate towards actions like this one. And the more people that are aware of it, the more powerfully it becomes an action of ‘the people,’ who are the sole legitimate arbiters of human rights and conduct. Like the Nuremberg trials did some 75 years ago, this effort by Fuellmich and his group may end up making a significant mark in the history of world justice.