Signs that this Pandemic is fundamentally being orchestrated by the ruling class in order to advance an agenda of control over the entire planet are readily visible, in almost every area of research one chooses to pursue. Vaccinating the entire population appears to be the key component of this agenda, as we can see how desperately the WHO is trying to maintain popular support for the notion that “vaccination = safety” in the face of pushback from a growing percentage of the population that are beginning to think for themselves.
The ruling class no doubt overestimated the potency of their tried and true social engineering tricks to convince a critical mass of the population that getting the vaccine was desirable. Don’t get me wrong, they’ve been able to convince a lot of people, but they are falling far short of the critical mass they need to proceed with their agenda, and have resorted to desperate tactics. One of those tactics was to blatantly change the meaning of ‘herd immunity.’
What is “Herd Immunity”?
For decades, the WHO ran on a platform that herd immunity through vaccination could be considered on a par with natural herd immunity, which is immunity in a population that is conferred through actual infection. Natural herd immunity, of course, adroitly governed the health of human populations with respect to infectious diseases for thousands of years before we entered the ‘Vaccine Era’ in the last century. As late as June 2020, the WHO’s definition of herd immunity, posted on one of their COVID-19 Q&A pages, was as follows:
“Herd immunity is the indirect protection from an infectious disease that happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection.” (source)
It is important to note that there were many in the medical profession who always believed natural herd immunity to be far superior to the artificial kind. But this didn’t really come to light until the unfolding of the Pandemic, where the pushback on the pandemic measures from both medical professionals and the public erupted. An example of this was with the Great Barrington Declaration, which was created by infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists and released on October 4th, 2020. It has now been cosigned by over 40,000 medical practitioners and over 750,000 concerned citizens.
If you haven’t read this short declaration I would highly recommend it. You will see there that these professionals use a concept called ‘focused protection,’ which recommends that Pandemic measures should focus on helping the most vulnerable in the population, while the vast majority can resume their normal lives, based on the proven efficacy of natural herd immunity. With the vast popularity of this document, founded on principles that were not only tried and true but appealed to the public’s common sense, you would think that the WHO would take notice and give it some consideration. Oh, they took notice of it, all right.
WHO Pulls a Fast One
It can’t be a coincidence that in the very same month, October 2020, with the Great Barrington Declaration bringing medical practitioners and scientists together and making a big splash among those in the population questioning the pandemic measures, that the WHO decided that it was time to ‘rejuvenate’ the definition of herd immunity by turning it into a bloated pro-vaccine advertisement and completely denigrating and invalidating natural herd immunity:
“‘Herd immunity’, also known as ‘population immunity’, is a concept used for vaccination, in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached. Herd immunity is achieved by protecting people from a virus, not by exposing them to it.
Vaccines train our immune systems to create proteins that fight disease, known as ‘antibodies’, just as would happen when we are exposed to a disease but — crucially — vaccines work without making us sick.
Vaccinated people are protected from getting the disease in question and passing it on, breaking any chains of transmission. With herd immunity, the vast majority of a population are vaccinated, lowering the overall amount of virus able to spread in the whole population.” (source)
This definition needed a lot more words in it than before because it is founded in manipulation and deception, not in common sense and self-evident truth. The very notion that an organization like the WHO can suddenly make an unsubstantiated change to scientific consensus is medical heresy. The public saw right through this, and after a big backlash, the WHO revised its new definition in December 31, 2020, to again include the mention of natural infection, while still emphasizing their support for vaccine-acquired immunity:
“’Herd immunity’, also known as ‘population immunity,’ is the indirect protection from an infectious disease that happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection.
WHO supports achieving ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination, not by allowing a disease to spread through any segment of the population, as this would result in unnecessary cases and deaths.
Herd immunity against COVID-19 should be achieved by protecting people through vaccination, not by exposing them to the pathogen that causes the disease.” (source)
In this revised definition, they work diligently to remove the obvious deception and omission that was found in the previous definition. So yes, this definition is more straightforward and works better in terms of maintaining some credibility for their organization. But it also reveals their bias for all to see. Now desperate to convince the population that vaccines are the one true hope for human safety and health, all they are doing is increasing the number of people who no longer trust them. In the absence of that trust in our authority, people are searching elsewhere for answers, and are starting to piece together what the overall agenda of the ruling class has always been.